Re: [PAF] Non-member submission from ["Roy Engle" <EngleER@ldschurch.org>]

[Cheryl Singhal <csinghal@CapAccess.org>]

Roy, I know it's an amazement to many, but SOME of us _prefer_ PAF 2.x 
and DOS.  At the very least, PAF 2.x never ever deleted someone from the 
database just because I removed  him as a child in a family, and it never 
ever put in a new generation when I tried to enter a sibling.

I guess I'll learn to tolerate PAF 4 eventually, but if it would ONLY do 
the simple things properly I'd be a whole bunch happier!

Cheryl

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Ed Rogers wrote:

> Bounced from another address - fowarded tol the list:..
> 
> 
> > From: "Roy Engle" <EngleER@ldschurch.org>
> > Are you using the DOS version of PAF 2.2 ?
> > If you are using MS Windows 95/98 etc. then upgrade to PAF4.0 or PAF5.0.
> >
> > Roy Engle, PAF5 Test/QA
> >
> >
> > >>> LeslieCab@aol.com 02/20/01 03:32AM >>>
> > I'm using PAF version 2.2 and when I enter the year of 2001 it accepts it
> but
> > when I exit the program and do a record check it states I have minor
> problems
> > with my data and when I repair it using FRCK -f it eliminates the 2001
> year
> > in my data.
> > Is there away to correct this so that I'm not loosing the information that
> I
> > entered?
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Leslie (Burford) Cabral
============================================================================
For assistance and help for the PAF Mailing List please contact
ed.rogers@innernet.org or http://www.innernet.org/paf/
Searchable list archives at http://www.innernet.org/paf/archives/
Want to unsubscribe? Try this link:
mailto:majordomo@innernet.org?subject=unsubscribe&body=unsubscribe%paf
============================================================================