Re: [PAF] "Stumper of a head-scratcher"

[Cheryl Singhal <csinghal@CapAccess.org>]

I'm not sure "all related" picks up a spouse's parents.  At least, when I 
tried it on a sample db, it didn't find 'em.  And I believe Barbara's 
program did.

And, for those following the continuing saga (g), PAFAbility STILL wins 
hands-down the easy and fast contest over PAFCompanion, GENBOOK, and 
PAF4's function.  I'm trying to nag her into fixing it so you can include 
the bd of children carried forward, which is the only thing I need that 
it doesn't do. :(  And if I were working with fewer people, I'd put the 
date in by hand, but with 20,000 names, and huge numbers of the the SAME 
name with siblings of the same names ... I DON'T think so!

Cheryl

On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Dave Hinz wrote:

> Hi, Ralph & PAF'ers!
> 
> Is this different than what you get by doing the following:
> Search -> Individual List
> Advanced
> "Relationship filter" -> All Related
> Select
> 
> Seems to me this is what you're looking for?  If not, let me know.
> 
> Dave Hinz
> Helenville, Wisconsin
> 
> 
> ralphs wrote:
> 
> > Back in the days of PAF-2.31, Barbara Bennett produced a fine
> > shareware program, Pafability, which printed out ALL of a person's
> > relatives --- not just ancestors, but ancestors plus all of their
> > descendants, which means all cousins of whatever degree.
> > 
> > I don't know any othe program which will print so complete a list.
> > Can anyone tell me how to do it?



============================================================================
For assistance and help for the PAF Mailing List please contact
ed.rogers@innernet.org or http://www.innernet.org/paf/
Searchable list archives at http://www.innernet.org/paf/archives/
============================================================================